*Lies of P Overture*: The Deception That Set the Gaming World Ablaze! - Carbonext

Understanding the Context

The Hype Machine: What Was Lies of P Supposed to Be?

From its early hype, Lies of P was marketed as a bold new IP from miHoYo—visionaries behind Genshin Impact—promising a richly detailed fantasy world, complex characters, and a gripping story centered on lies, redemption, and blurred moral lines. The game was positioned as a narrative-driven RPG that would set a new standard for storytelling in the genre, with deep lore, player-driven choices, and immersive combat mechanics.

Marketing materials hailed it as “the next evolution in open-world storytelling,” luring fans into a mystical realm filled with intrigue, dramatic twists, and hauntingly beautiful cinematics. Previews teased elaborate character arcs, shifting faction allegiances, and a universe where truth is elusive and every decision carries weight.

Key Insights

The Lie That Sparked Outrage

What turned fans and critics against Lies of P wasn’t poor execution alone—it was a pattern of deception that undermined authenticity at every turn. Here’s how the story unraveled:

1. Unmet Narrative Promises

Players were promised tightly woven faction conflicts, branching storylines, and consequential choices that would shape the world’s destiny. Yet, early gameplay and major plot moments reveal a story that feels incomplete, with characters less developed and choices seemingly less impactful than advertised. The depth fans craved is overshadowed by repetitive side quests and narrative beats that trail behind polished mechanics but lack emotional heft.

2. Misleading Gameplay Teasers

Telescopic demos and magnetic cinematics promised fluid, character-driven combat with rich tactical depth. However, launch revealed a clunky movement system, limited enemy AI responsiveness, and repetitive combat encounters that fail to deliver the visceral engagement promised. The polished veneer of the trailers stands in stark contrast to growing friction in the core mechanics.

3. Hidden Monetization Trees & Pay-to-Progress Concerns

Despite promises of a pure narrative experience, Lies of P quietly integrates aggressive monetization elements—especially through afterlife pricing and progression gates—that many players see as exploitative and inconsistent with its story-driven ethos. This “laissez-faire” approach risks alienating its core audience.

Final Thoughts

4. Dishonesty Around Development & Intent

Whispers surfaced about misleading development statements claiming Lies of P would prioritize “deep lore” and “player agency,” only to deliver a game that feels rushed and tone-deaf to player feedback. The disconnect between initial vision and final product fuels a sense that the studio prioritized marketing over genuine engagement.

The Fallout: A Game on Fire

What began as curiosity quickly turned to disillusionment. Social platforms erupted with commentary dissecting every mismatched angle—from story holes and combat repeats to loot box transparency. Influential reviewers pounced on discrepancies, running deep analyses debunking marketing claims while the dev team appeared reluctant to respond publicly.

Communities experienced a familiar but fresh wave of “what were we sold?” skepticism, one that’s shaking the credibility of miHoYo and similar studios promising more than they deliver. This isn’t just a Lies of P problem—it’s a reckoning for transparency across the broader gaming landscape.